The Kremlin is hysterical over Starmer’s plan
20 February 13:38
The Kremlin is concerned about the plan for post-war security in Ukraine, which British Prime Minister Keir Starmer plans to present to US President Donald Trump next week. This was reported by "Komersant Ukrainian" with reference to Russian media.
The press secretary of the president of the aggressor country, Russia, Dmitry Peskov, commented on the information that the EU countries could send up to 30,000 European troops to Ukraine.
He noted that the Kremlin carefully examines all, including sometimes contradictory, official statements in the EU on this topic.
“This is a matter of concern to us, because it is… a possible eventual deployment of NATO military contingents to Ukraine,” the Kremlin spokesman said.
According to him, this “takes on a completely different meaning” in terms of security for the Russian Federation.
Peskov also recalled the words of Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov that the deployment of NATO troops cannot be acceptable to Russia on the territory of Ukraine.
“I would like to remind you of the words of the Foreign Minister. The deployment of military contingents of NATO member states on the territory of Ukraine cannot be acceptable to us,” the Kremlin spokesman emphasized.
It should be noted that Starmer will present to Trump a plan to send less than 30,000 European troops to Ukraine and will try to ensure American protection for this deployment.
The prime minister is expected to detail how European forces could monitor any ceasefire agreement agreed to by the US president when they meet in Washington next week.
But he will urge Trump to keep US fighter jets and missiles on standby in Eastern Europe to respond with deadly force if Russia violates the truce, the newspaper claims.
Follow us on Telegram: the main news in a nutshell
The British Prime Minister has promised to act as a “bridge” between Washington and Europe, as the continent and Kyiv seem to have been cut off from Trump’s peace efforts. Starmer will emphasize that it is in the US interest to remain engaged in preventing a third Russian invasion after the end of hostilities.
Anglo-French strategy
The Anglo-French strategy on “assurance” was presented to Europe’s most influential leaders at an emergency meeting in Paris earlier this week as they reacted urgently to the start of peace talks between Trump and Putin.
It was developed amid fears that the US president would wash his hands of Ukraine almost immediately after the deal was concluded. Pete Hegseth, the US Secretary of Defense, said that the Europeans and Canada would bear full responsibility for peacekeeping operations in Ukraine.
According to the Anglo-French plan, fewer than 30,000 troops under European leadership would be deployed in Ukrainian cities, ports, and other critical infrastructure such as nuclear power plants, far from the current front lines.
Rather than deploying a much larger force in the war-torn country, the mission will rely on “technical monitoring,” including reconnaissance aircraft, drones and satellites to provide “a complete picture of what’s going on,” the Western official said.
The operation will be backed by sufficient firepower to “control and shoot down these attacks,” the source added, to open Ukraine’s airspace and enable commercial flights.
Naval patrol ships would also be sent to the Black Sea to monitor Russian threats to commercial shipping routes.
The plan outlined by Western officials is significantly smaller than the 200,000 troop peacekeeping mission that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy had demanded as a possible price for signing a peace deal.
But with opposition from Germany, Spain, and Italy to troops on the ground, European options for securing Ukraine’s future appear limited.
Follow us on Telegram: the main news in a nutshell
The role of the United States
Leaving the talks in Paris, Starmer said that such an operation would require “U.S. support” to deter Russia from attacking again.
“The purpose of the support is to have confidence that any forces deployed will not be attacked by Russia,”
the Western official said.
Such support could include U.S. fighter jets stationed in Romania and Poland, ready to respond to any future Russian aggression.
A much larger multinational ground force could also be based on NATO’s eastern borders, ready to move in to protect European troops inside Ukraine if necessary.
The strategy is also consistent with the longstanding policy of not placing NATO forces in direct confrontation with Russian forces in support of Ukraine.
It is hoped that Trump will agree to the support, as it would mean that no US troops would be deployed in post-war Ukraine.
A European official told the Telegraph that NATO will also have to start discussions on Article 5 on collective defense, which states that an attack on one member is an attack on all.
While there is no expectation that this article will cover European troops stationed in Ukraine, some countries will insist that this protection remains.
Follow us on Telegram: top news in a nutshell
Security of Ukraine and Europe
The Munich Security Conference 2025 came as a real shock to many and a cold shower to European politicians after the US representatives voiced their vision of the future security model in Europe and the world. In particular, US Vice President Jay DeVance ‘s speech was about Europe no longer relying on the US security umbrella, as the US will no longer guarantee it. The Europeans were also told that the security of Ukraine after the ceasefire with Russia will also be on their shoulders, as it concerns European affairs, from which the United States is withdrawing.
And now the United States does not even “physically” see Europe at the table with Russia.
Against this backdrop, President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelenskyy called for the creation of the European Armed Forces. This idea has already been quickly rejected in Poland.
Europeans were shocked by this turn from the United States. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer was the first to recover, saying that his country “can and will” send its contingent to Ukraine as a peacekeeper if a truce with Russia is concluded.
on February 17, French President Emmanuel Macron urgently convened the heads of “leading European states” to form a common position on this issue. However, it was not achieved. As it turned out, Britain, France, and Sweden were in favor of sending peacekeeping contingents to Ukraine, while Germany, Poland, Italy, and Spain were against it. Later, Macron said he was not going to send troops to Ukraine.
Follow us on Telegram: the main news in a nutshell
